The label arrives with a picture: a small nose, a tip that turns up, sometimes a dip in the bridge. The pictures do not match. One page says the bridge is concave, another says convex, and a third does not mention the bridge at all. The tip is the only feature that every page describes.
This page separates the two features instead of choosing a side. It shows what each feature means, how each one is read, where the sources split, and why a front photograph can settle one part of the question and miss the other. It does not rank the shape or compare treatments; it only puts a ruler beside the word.
What the celestial label describes
The label lives in consumer writing, not in clinical classification. The six readable pages on the first search result use it as a synonym for an upturned, turned-up, retroussé or snub nose. One page opens by calling it an upturned nose; another says it is also known as a turned-up nose; a third lists it beside upturned and retroussé in the same sentence. Whatever else the word carries, the tip is the part every page puts first.
The word itself is not a category in the measurement literature. A search of Europe PMC on 23 October 2026 returned no record for the exact phrase, while the same search returned 845 records for upturned nose. The three measurement papers read for this page do not use the label at all: one classifies the dorsum, one uses the nasolabial angle as a tip-rotation reading, and one measures both on preoperative photographs. Their vocabulary is descriptive, and it does not include this name.
The bridge is where the pages part. Three of the six first-page pages do not mention it. Two describe a dip: one in a table as a slight scoop, one as a dent in the middle side of the bridge. One says the curvature from bridge to tip is convex. A second search, adding the word concave, found three more pages that describe a depression and one that describes a straight bridge. That is not a majority with an outlier. It is a label with a shared tip and a disputed bridge.
The practical consequence is small but important. A sentence such as a celestial nose has a concave bridge is a description some pages use, not a definition the label carries. The next section gives each feature its own reading so the two can be checked separately.
No account · No ad pixels · No photo upload
Detection runs on-device with MediaPipe. Nothing is uploaded — no account, no email, no storage.
Two axes, and only one is shared
Tip rotation is read in profile. The nasolabial angle is the angle at the subnasale between the columellar line and the upper-lip line: the columella is the strip of tissue between the nostrils, and the subnasale is where the nasal septum meets the upper lip. A larger angle means the tip is rotated further upward. The angle is a profile measurement; a front photograph collapses it.
The published ranges do not agree. A 2022 surgical study prints a conventional range of 95 to 110 degrees in women and 90 to 95 degrees in men. A 2026 consumer page prints 95 to 105 in men and 100 to 110 in women. A second 2026 consumer page puts the threshold for an upturned nose above 110 and splits 105 to 110, 110 to 120 and above 120 into mild, moderate and severe. The same angle, three sets of cutoffs, and no page explains where its cutoffs come from. A 2026 study of 60 rhinoplasty candidates found 31 within the conventional range and 29 outside it, which is a useful reminder that a reference range is a sorting device, not a gate.
The dorsum is read in profile too, but as a shape rather than an angle. One method draws a straight line from the radix, the root of the nose between the eyes, to the tip, and judges whether the bridge sits behind that line, on it or in front of it. A 2011 rhinometry paper uses the same lateral-view idea and names the three outcomes straight, concave and convex. None of the consumer pages prints a depth in millimetres or an angle for the bridge; they use the words as visual classes.
That asymmetry is the finding. One axis has a published angle and several competing cutoffs. The other has a visual classification and no cutoff at all. The label supplies neither. It is a name for the first axis, with the second axis attached by some pages and contradicted by others.
Two features, where each one is read, and what the consumer pages supply. The tip has a published angle but no shared cutoff; the bridge has a visual classification, a split direction and no depth in millimetres. Counts refer to the nine consumer pages in the dated table below.
| Feature | Where it is read | Standard reading | What the label supplies |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tip rotation | Profile | Nasolabial angle at the subnasale, between the columellar line and the upper-lip line; a larger angle means more upward rotation | Three different degree bands; no shared cutoff |
| Dorsum profile | Profile | Straight or curved line from the radix to the tip; classified as straight, concave or convex | Five pages say scoop, dent or concave; one says convex; three do not mention it |
| Nasal length | Profile | Nasion to the tip; part of the projection ratio used in surgical measurement | Short or small, with no millimetre and no cutoff |
| Nostril show | Front or oblique | No standard cutoff in the sources here | Visible nostrils; the amount changes with camera height and head tilt |
| Tip shape | Front | No standard reading in the sources here | Rounded, prominent or delicate; no cutoff |
The nasolabial angle and the dorsum line are profile readings; a front view cannot measure either one. The five pages counted in the dorsum row are the dated consumer entries that describe a scoop, dent or concave curve; the one convex page is dated 2023, and the three that do not mention the bridge are dated 2024, 2026 and 2026. The nasal-length row uses the nasion-to-tip line that the projection ratio in the 2022 study uses; the label itself prints no length. None of the nine consumer pages prints a millimetre.
Celestial and button: where the labels part
The button nose is usually described as small and short, with a slightly upturned tip and a rounded tip shape. One consumer page treats it as a separate label and gives the celestial nose a more pronounced upward tilt. Another puts celestial and button in the same table row, with the same short length and the same lift. A third lists upturned, celestial, concave and button together as names for one look. The boundary is not stable across the pages.
The overlap is the tip. The claimed difference is size and length: a button nose is said to be shorter and smaller, a celestial nose longer with a stronger turn. No page prints a length cutoff or an angle cutoff for either name, and the page that groups them in one row does not explain what would separate them. A reader who wants a working distinction can measure nasal length from the nasion to the tip and the nasolabial angle in profile, then describe the two readings. That produces a description, not a boundary.
This is why the two names should not be used as diagnoses or as instructions for a treatment. If two pages can call the same nose by different names, the name is not the evidence. The readings are.
What a front photograph misses, and what makeup can do
A front photograph can show the width of the nose, the shape of the tip and how much nostril is visible. It cannot show the nasolabial angle, because that angle lies in the sagittal plane and a front view projects it to nearly nothing. It also cannot show whether the bridge sits behind or in front of the radix-to-tip line; that is a depth difference, and depth needs a side view. A camera held above the face can make the tip look more upturned than it is, and a lifted chin can do the same. The only view that shows both readings is a level profile.
Makeup works on reflected light, not on cartilage. A darker band beside the bridge or a highlight on the tip can change how wide or how short the nose looks in a front photograph, and that is a real change in the photograph. It does not move the columella, change the nasolabial angle or alter the profile line. If you want to test whether a routine changed anything, take a front and a profile photograph before and after, at the same distance and in the same light. The profile is the control.
This page does not compare treatments. A filler or a surgical change is a different category with different risks, and none of the consumer pages read here prints the kind of outcome data that would support a comparison. The distinction this page can make is narrower: a surface product changes the light, and a structural reading records the shape.
Twelve dated definitions, sorted by publication day
The table orders twelve published positions from September 2011 to October 2026. Three are measurement papers and nine are consumer pages. The third column records what each source says the label describes; the fourth records only the bridge, because that is the column where the definitions separate. The dates are publication dates; later revisions are listed in the footnote.
Two patterns are visible at once. The three measurement papers do not use the label at all, and the nine consumer pages never print a millimetre. Only two consumer pages print an angle, and the two angle bands do not agree. The bridge column splits five to one to three: five pages describe a scoop, dent or concave curve, one calls the curve convex, and three leave the bridge out.
The table is not a vote. A count of pages cannot settle a definition, and a later date is not a tighter one. What the table can do is show that the label's common part is the tip and that the bridge is an attachment, not a shared requirement.
Twelve positions, ascending by publication day: three measurement papers and nine consumer pages. The fourth column is the bridge each page describes, or does not describe. No page in the table prints a millimetre; only two consumer pages print an angle.
| Published | What it is | What it says the label describes | Bridge in the definition | Numbers printed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 September 2011 | Measurement paper, rhinometry | Does not use the label; classifies the dorsum from a lateral view as straight, concave or convex | Three classes, no label | None for this label |
| 23 December 2015 | Consumer page, Dr Philip Miller | Turned-up nose, also called celestial; a depression in the mid-part with a protruding tip | Concave | A 13% population share, no sample or method |
| 31 January 2022 | Consumer page, Dr Jeremy Hunt | Small nose with a dent in the middle side of the bridge and a prominent tip | Dent, concave | None |
| 25 March 2022 | Measurement paper, 21 adults | Does not use the label; treats the nasolabial angle as tip rotation; conventional 95–110 in women and 90–95 in men | Not classified | Angles in degrees |
| 2 August 2023 | Consumer page, Guy Watts | Upturned tip with a graceful curvature; the bridge is well defined and may be slightly narrow | Convex | None |
| 22 March 2024 | Consumer page, Belorens | A pronounced upward tilt at the tip; also called a turned-up nose | Not mentioned | None |
| 17 September 2024 | Consumer page, Vivid Clinic | A small dent in the middle of the bridge and a tip that angles gently upward | Dent, concave | None |
| 30 January 2025 | Consumer page, Berkeley Square | A shorter nose with an upturned tip and slightly more visible nostrils; a table row groups celestial and button | Slight scoop | None |
| 11 February 2026 | Consumer page, S45 Clinic | A tip that points up, or a nasolabial angle above 110; mild 105–110, moderate 110–120, severe above 120 | Not mentioned | Angles in degrees |
| 16 May 2026 | Consumer page, Acibadem | A subtle concave curve along the bridge leading to a slightly elevated tip | Concave | None |
| 8 October 2026 | Measurement paper, 60 candidates | Does not use the label; measures the nasolabial angle at the subnasale and judges the dorsum against a radix-to-tip line | Not classified | Angles and counts |
| 15 October 2026 | Consumer page, Tabeebo | Increased tip rotation, short nasal length, visible nostrils and a wide nasolabial angle; celestial used for a softly upturned tip | Not mentioned | Angles in degrees |
Publication dates, with later revisions kept out of the sort: Dr Jeremy Hunt revised 26 November 2025; Guy Watts 31 July 2026; S45 Clinic 2 October 2026; Berkeley Square 22 October 2026; Dr Philip Miller 17 October 2024; Vivid Clinic 14 October 2026; Acibadem 7 June 2026. The 2015 page's 13% share is recorded as a claim, not a measurement: it prints no sample and no method. The three measurement papers do not use the label. The 2021 Seattle page that describes a straight bridge is not in the table because its other numbers are population and ranking claims without a method; its straight-bridge line is noted in the text above. A search of Europe PMC on 23 October 2026 returned zero records for the exact phrase and 845 for upturned nose.
What changed, what did not
What changed between 2011 and 2026 is the amount of detail around the tip. The 2011 paper had three dorsum classes and no label. The 2022 study treated the nasolabial angle as a rotation reading and printed conventional ranges. By 2026, two consumer pages were printing degree bands of their own, and the later of the two split the upper end into mild, moderate and severe. The vocabulary grew around the tip, and the numbers grew with it.
What did not change is the bridge column. The five pages that describe a depression use five different phrases: depression, dent, small dent, concave curve, slight scoop. The one convex page uses a different direction altogether, and three pages leave the bridge out. The later pages are not closer to one another on this column than the earlier ones. A later date is not a convergence.
What also did not change is the absence of the label from measurement writing. The three papers read for this page use the nasolabial angle, the dorsum classification and the radix-to-tip line; none of them uses the name. That is not a criticism of the consumer pages. It is a division of labor: the pages supply the word, and the papers supply the readings. The mistake is to expect the word to carry the readings.
What this means for you: treat the tip and the bridge as two separate notes. The tip has an angle, and the angle has more than one reference range. The bridge has a direction, and the direction has no shared cutoff. A label that omits one of those notes is not wrong; it is incomplete.
What to write down instead of the label
A profile photograph taken at nose height, with the head level and the camera about a metre away, is enough to take both readings. Ask someone to hold the camera at the same height as the nose rather than above it, and keep the light even. A phone at arm's length will distort the profile; a mirror and a steady hand are often better.
- Mark the subnasale where the septum meets the upper lip, the most forward point of the columella, and the upper-lip point. Draw the two lines and measure the nasolabial angle in degrees. Write the landmarks beside the number, because a different pair of points is a different measurement.
- Draw a straight line from the radix, between the eyes, to the tip. Note whether the bridge sits behind that line, on it or in front of it. Call it concave, straight or convex only after the line is drawn.
- Measure nasal length from the nasion to the tip if you want to compare the nose with the button description. Keep the camera and the head position the same for the second reading.
- Take each reading twice. A one-degree difference is not a finding; a change in camera height or head tilt can move the apparent tip more than that.
- Write the label last. The two readings can be checked against a later photograph; the label cannot.
The celestial label has one shared feature and one disputed attachment. Every page read for this page describes an upturned tip; five describe a scoop, dent or concave bridge, one describes a convex bridge and three leave the bridge out. No page prints a millimetre, and the label has no clinical cutoff.
A tip rotation and a bridge direction are two readings, not one name. Take them separately, write down the landmarks, and let the label describe what the readings already show.
Questions this page answers
What is a celestial nose?
It is a consumer label for a nose whose tip turns up. The pages read for this page agree on that tip and disagree on the bridge: some describe a scoop, dent or concave curve, one calls the curve convex, and others do not mention the bridge. The label has no clinical cutoff and does not appear in the measurement papers read here.
Does the label require a concave bridge?
No. Three of the six first-page pages do not mention the bridge at all, one describes a convex curve and two describe a dip. A concave bridge is one version of the label, not a requirement shared by the pages. If you want to check the bridge, read it in profile against a line from the radix to the tip and call it concave, straight or convex.
Can makeup change the shape of the nose?
Makeup changes reflected light, not cartilage. A darker band beside the bridge or a highlight on the tip can change how wide or short the nose looks in a front photograph, but it does not move the columella or change the profile line. A before-and-after profile photograph at the same distance and in the same light is the control.
What nasolabial angle counts as upturned?
There is no single cutoff. A 2022 surgical study prints a conventional range of 95 to 110 degrees in women and 90 to 95 in men; one 2026 consumer page prints 95 to 105 in men and 100 to 110 in women; another puts the threshold above 110 and splits the upper end into mild, moderate and severe. The angle is measured at the subnasale between the columellar line and the upper-lip line.
Can a front photograph show whether the tip is upturned?
It can show how much nostril is visible and what the tip looks like from the front, but it cannot measure the nasolabial angle, because that angle lies in the sagittal plane. A camera held above the face can also exaggerate the lift. A level profile photograph is the view that shows both the angle and the bridge line.
Is the label used in medical literature?
A search of Europe PMC on 23 October 2026 returned no record for the exact phrase, while the same search returned 845 records for upturned nose. The three measurement papers read for this page use the nasolabial angle, the dorsum classification and the radix-to-tip line, not this name. The label is consumer vocabulary, and the readings are the measurements.